Author: Felecia Roberts

Simply put, and to save you time scanning the article for the answer, the reason big banks will adopt Zelle instead of Venmo is because they developed and own Zelle. Paypal owns Braintree, that owns Venmo. Paypal and Zelle are from the same mindset of decentralizing banks and removing them from the middle of the transaction. In essence, both PayPal and Venmo are making the same statement, though it’s not as loud these days as most of us have adopted their platforms without necessarily taking a political stance for years, which is that the way most financial transactions, from large stock purchases to mortgages all the way down to small ATM withdrawals go through big banks. Those big banks control the market on pricing, and it isn’t cheap. They hold much of the world’s wealth, cheated many out of their savings in multiple financial scandals, and pull tons of dollars out of the world economy without adding a single physical detail of their existence to the world, besides the actual banks themselves, which very few people even step foot in these days.

When PayPal, and all its various competitors came along, the first reaction was to ignore it. It is a small thing, unlikely to amount to much, as this internet thing is a fad. Then it was to fight it. Not let traditional banking interact with these platforms. Soon after that, the smaller banks got wise and started playing ball, after all this money had to originate from somewhere, and then all other banks fell in line eventually. PayPal was used to transfer money for small transactions, but it wasn’t replacing the mortgage or bonds or futures. All was well and good. PayPal just allowed people to transfer dollars to each other and a decent amount of ecommerce, but money was still moving through the banks all the same.

Then came Apple Pay. Now credit cards, many of them underwritten by large banks, were being cut out of some transactions. Not even that many, all things considered, but enough to show the big banks that these nicks and cuts could lead to a lot down the road if they didn’t get into the game.

Venmo had been out there for a while as well, and money was floating around without a home, person to person, and into Apple accounts, growing stronger in familiarity, making cash less necessary, banks less necessary—except in origination—and it was easy to see that it wouldn’t be long before paychecks were deposited straight into Venmo accounts, landlords and mortgage companies would be accepting Venmo payments, as well as restaurants, gyms, grocery stores, mechanics, coffee shops, on down the road until future generations not only never stepped inside a bank but they would seem like payphones to them: only something to ironically take a photo in front of and laugh at.

So now we have Zelle. It doesn’t have a big user-base yet, but it will. It will be aimed at older millennials and younger Gen X. Basically, those young enough to understand, but thus far resistant to Venmo for what their reasons. You will see it show up in small local banks like Rhinebeck Bank in Hudson Valley New York. It is owned by the banks Bank of America, BB&T, Capital One, JPMorgan Chase, PNC Bank, US Bank, Citibank and Wells Fargo , and while they are VERY out of touch with what people want or need, they have so much leverage and financial real estate that it will be a force to be dealt with and will have a lot of market share no matter where the market turns.

In this world of intertia loyalty, where we remain loyal to companies and brands mainly because it is seemingly such a heavy lift to change—especially change something where so many accounts are tied in—our view is to pick the winning horse, for better or worse. Going with Zelle may save you a lot of time in the long run. Hopefully, the rest of the world can force the market to make these transactions free for as long as possible.

There are countless tips and strategies on how to reduce your monthly mortgage payments, but comparatively few on how to save money on a new mortgage when buying a home. Too many home buyers don’t even know about some of these options, much less give them serious consideration when finalizing the details of the mortgage with their home lender.

 

Buying Points on the Mortgage

There are two different kinds of “points” that people buy: origination points and discount points. Origination points offset the lender’s cost of processing the loan in exchange for a lower interest rate. Discount points is even simpler in that you’re making a one-time upfront payment to lower the interest rate on the loan. Often, the type of points you’re buying depends on the standard or default loan terms offered by the lender. Some lenders like to market a no closing-cost mortgage but then also offer the option to buy discount points when the borrower realizes lower interest rates are available to them. Either way, you’re paying more upfront to reduce the overall cost of the loan.

On a related note, due to their specific closing costs and loan terms, different lenders offer more generous terms than others when it comes to buying points. Fortunately, there’s a key metric that simplifies the decision to buy points. Ask the home lender what the breakeven date is for the points you’re considering buying. The longer you plan on staying in the home, the more sense it will make to buy points.

 

Minimizing and Negotiating Closing Costs

Even apart from covering the origination fees and paying down your interest rate, there are other ways to save money on a home loan by minimizing closing costs. Some of the taxes and governmental fees are unavoidable, but many closing costs are negotiable either directly through the lender or through the third-party vendor. This includes the inspection, survey, appraisal, notary, escrow fees, and title insurance.

When available, the most effective way to lower closing costs is to make an all-cash offer. Not taking out a mortgage completely eliminates the underwriting fees and many of the insurance requirements that come with a mortgage. It also makes you a much more attractive buyer to a prospective seller. More real estate investors are also buying properties in cash rather than trying to finance and manage multiple properties, especially as interest rates continue to rise and the cost calculations for taking on additional mortgage debt look less favorable. Similarly, some millennials are getting an edge up on the housing market by using a parent’s home equity to make an all-cash offer. Then, they can work out the mortgage and repayment mechanism after the home is purchased.

As with buying points, many of the most popular strategies for reducing closing costs have trade-offs that you’ll need to be prepared for. Closing at the end of the month will reduce the prepaid interest you’ll need to pay as part of the closing, but it will also reduce the time until your first mortgage payment. It also creates additional logistical stress and hassles as most buyers and lenders are trying to close at the end of the month as well.

 

Working with Realtors who Offer Real Value

The total real estate commission on a home sale is negotiated between the seller and the seller’s real estate agent. This leaves few options  for the buyer to proactively reduce the commission paid out of the sales price. It also mistakenly creates the impression that there is nothing at all a buyer can do to possibly reduce the traditional commission paid on the home purchase. Whatever the commission on a home sale, it’s typically split between the seller and buyer agents. But the average real esate commission nowadays is hovering around 5 percent, which means a lot of people would say many buyers should have to pay no more than 2.5% of the sales price to their agent.

Many buyer real estate agents are now willing to offer some type of cash rebate based on this type of commission structure. So, if the listing commission set at a full 6 percent by the seller, your agent is willing to refund the half-percent after the deal is closed and the commission fee is received. That said, if you’re looking for something unusual, something special, something that is hard to peg down a fair value for, then having an experienced and savvy realtor on your side can make a big difference. Either way, it’s hard to overstate the importance of finding a realtor who offers real value as part of the process.

Carrington Mortgage Services has launched a new line of subprime mortgages targeting the 100 million U.S. consumers with less than perfect credit. While Carrington already offers subprime loans via government channels, such as the FHA and VA, these new additions are not backed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. They appear, instead, to be proprietary loan solutions offered by Carrington itself.

Here’s what the mortgage looks like: Borrowers can have FICO scores as low as 500 and loan amounts as high as $1.5 million. Recent credit events are okay, and bank statements are acceptable to verify income. Cash-out refinancing can be as high as $500,000. Carrington is advertising these loans as the ideal solution for those who have low credit scores, high debt-to-income ratios, a recent credit event, or who are self-employed.

 

What Carrington Mortgage is Saying

The company has said that these loans are “non-agency,” meaning they do not comply with the underwriting guidelines of Fannie May or Freddie Mac. Additionally, Carrington is offering jumbo loan amounts, which exceed the current conforming loan limit of $453,100. This is meant as a way to increase borrower flexibility over standard loan options. So, why should we care? Subprime mortgages were a major catalyst in the American financial crisis in the mid-2000s. Just a decade after the biggest financial crisis in U.S. history, the company has begun to offer these predatory loans. However, this isn’t the whole story.

 

History Review and Personalized Advice

One might argue that underwriting issues weren’t the only factor to lead to the housing crisis. Rather, the risk was layered. A multitude of factors, such as a low credit score, high debt-to-income ratio, no or low down payment, and limited documentation, combined to create a high-risk home loan. Conversely, a borrower with a very low credit score but a large amount of assets and down payment, along with a stable income, could be a suitable candidate for this new subprime loan. Low credit scores are incredibly common, and it could be that Carrington is attempting to offer a solution to those wrecked by the financial crisis and attempting to rebuild.

That said, if you have a low credit score and are in search of a mortgage, do your research. Don’t side with Carrington just because they will accept your low credit score; shop around and see what else you can find.